Daughters have an equal right in ancestral property

CaseVineeta Sharma v. Rakesh SharmaCourtSupreme Court of IndiaDecided11 Aug 2020Bench3 judges
In one line

A daughter is a coparcener by birth in a Hindu joint family, with the same rights as a son.

What happened

Courts had given different answers on whether a daughter gets an equal share only if her father was alive on 9 September 2005, when the Hindu Succession Act was amended.

What the court decided

  • Daughters are coparceners by birth, with the same rights and duties as sons, under the amended Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act.
  • It does not matter whether the father was alive on 9 September 2005.
  • Partitions completed before 20 December 2004 by a registered deed or court decree are not reopened.

What it means for you

  • A daughter, married or unmarried, can claim her share in ancestral (joint family) property.
  • This applies to ancestral property, not to property the father bought himself and left by a will.
  • A legal notice for partition is usually the first step.

Source: Judgment of the Supreme Court of India in Vineeta Sharma v. Rakesh Sharma, decided on 11 Aug 2020.

Legal Notice for Partition of PropertyDrafted & signed by an advocate · Within 24 hours

This summary is general information, not legal advice for your situation. Laws change; talk to an advocate before acting.

LIVEPriya from LegalDoc360Talk to an advocate freeUsually replies in 5 min
Talk to an advocate free
Chat on WhatsApp